Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

20

Extrusion International 4/2016

COMPOUNDING

determine its optimum operating point depending on the

properties of the raw materials. Similarly, improvements

can be achieved for planning service measures in the sense

of condition monitoring and predictive maintenance, for

instance as a result of changes in differential pressure or an

increase in fine particulates in the clean air.

...but the subject of engineering is being neglected

AZO indeed considers the toolkits to be helpful, even if

“the engineering aspect has not been included” as Her-

zig criticises. “There is very substantial added value spe-

cifically in the engineering for plant design and construc-

tion.” Nevertheless, after thorough preparation with the

help of the toolkits, AZO succeeded in conducting a rigor-

ous analysis of its products. “Once we had classified our

products, we agreed on several important areas where

further development is needed”, explains Bußbach, “but

we didn’t want to tackle all six sections from the toolkit at

once. We wanted to proceed with selected issues in man-

ageable stages. Apart from the criterion for ‘integration

of sensors/actuators’, the plant engineering company

from Osterburken identified connectivity and communi-

cation as a major area where action is particularly neces-

sary. AZO continues to move forward on issues such as

monitoring and data storage, although the company al-

ready considers itself in a good position there with regard

to Industry 4.0.

Until it is possible to further develop products for the pur-

poses of Industry 4.0, creativity will be called for in phase

3 of the Industry 4.0 project. Ultimately it should culmi-

nate in a new product or business model, which requires

ideas to be examined for their market potential, their

benefit and viability – phase 4 of the project. AZO used

the St. Gallen Business Model Navigator recommended in

the VDMA guideline as it examines all these criteria from

every angle. Ideas which promised great market potential

but were assessed as too tight for the existing resources,

were rejected just as were ideas, which, while considered

relatively easy to realise, would however deliver too little

added value for AZO and its customers.

Careful assessment of added value, market potential and

feasibility

Anyone casting a glance at the bulletin board that AZO’s

project team was then using for generating and cluster-

ing, will soon recognise: collaboration with the KIT re-

leased considerable energy: there was no shortage of

ideas. For a mid-sized company in particular however, it

is important to remain focussed in the last phase of the

process, the actual implementation: on issues that are as

high as possible on the right in the matrix for potential

and strengths. Ultimately AZO identified five projects,

four of which are already being actively implemented to-

day. Integrated engineering, pneumatic conveying 4.0,

unambiguous product identification and the screener as

Industry 4.0 component.

Integrated engineering generates added value immedi-

ately in the company itself and has positive knock-on ef-

fects for customers, according to the head of the plastics

engineering division: “Engineering is not only faster and

more affordable; we can also provide the customer with

valuable information in this way.”

Added value from the combination of identification

technology, mobile terminals and information portal

Implementation of the “unambiguous identification”

project also seems relatively straightforward. At AZO this

means it is possible to identify integrated plant compo-

nents at any time and link them with information about

their life cycle. Bußbach clarifies: “When backed by an in-

formation portal, you obtain valuable information about

every component rapidly – whether using QR codes, bar-

codes, RFID or a rating plate.” When were the filters last

changed? Which product is in which receiver at this par-

ticular moment? Which individual parts have been built

in a component – which motor is in the agitator, which

screw feeder in the dosing weigher? It is easy to imag-

ine that the information portal required at a plant engi-

neering company will be extremely complex. Nonetheless

Pic. 3: In workshops ideas are examined for their market potential,

their benefit and viability

Pic. 4: Matrix for potential and strengths to identify

the Industry 4.0 projects AZO will implement